Sorry, it was horribly designed. You basically end up using the same 5 plants to do every level. THere was hardly any variation. Stuff that made the first game have disappeared. You just ended up using the same plants to kill so many zombies in a certain time, generate so much sun, don't let them the pass the flower line, and don't lose any lawn mowers. That's it.
I had just downloaded the game maybe a month ago and was about to delete it because it was getti...
Gaming forums are one of the worst places to get an idea of how a game is going to sell among demographics. Gaming forums, by and large, mostly contain the hardcore demo. PvZ and TF will cater both hardcore and casual demos. If PvZ is taking money from one of the same demos as TF, they are eating into each other's profit- especially if they're the same genre. Do you really think a business would delay a game if they didn't know it would poach sales from one of their other product...
I know most here won't agree because you're all hardcore but if you look at this from the business perspective, the two games would eat into each other's sales. Hardcore gamers are going to buy both but the more casual gamers and those people with limited budgets will have to choose which one to buy which poaches sales from the other.
I honestly think it would be wise to delay one of them. Find out which game needs the most refinement and give it the extra month...
If it's not series fatigue, then it's because the game flat out sucks balls. Either way, it's bad, Activision.
I'm not talking about BF3 and BC2. I'm talking about the difference between BF3 and BF4.
What I was referencing with BF3 and BC2 was the level of destructability in them. BC2 had a lot. BF3 went much lower. BF4 seem to be a mix between the two. That's what I was saying.
There is a big difference between BF3 and BC2 in the games as a whole, though. I just don't notice much difference at all between BF3 and BF4.
The big problem is that it's essentially the same game as BF3. BF3 should have had Commander Mode in it to begin with. I really didn't notice any other difference. The destructible environments really don't seem much different from BF3 or BC2. It's just tweaked between the two.
So that leaves BF4 looking like a money grab and many people are already tired of that practice from COD. Try doing something innovative like Titanfall.
Can't stand the spawns, bullet damage(feels almost like HC), and maps(WAY too many hidden camping spots. You pair all the hidden nooks with the high bullet damage and it makes it hard to move anywhere. This is especially problematic for Domination).
They are resembling a money hungry business. It has nothing to do with communism. How do you even come to that conclusion?
Anyone think there are going to be PS4 shortages this holiday season?
Everyone keeps talking about the jaggies but holy crap does the animation look bad.
The controls felt better for the PC version. They were sluggish in BF3 on PC for me. BF4 are much more responsive.
Other than that, I really didn't notice anything different between BF3 and BF4.
I don't get how anyone can say MW2 was any good considering it introduced one of the worst features in gaming history: P2P.
P2P alone ruined COD for me.
I could start and end with TRUE dedicated servers without lag compensation.
I could continue with what chaoz already said with Mods, no DLC(DLC ruins the game and fractures the community), etc.
It's most likely a system where the files have to be extracted first so you have two copies of the game which adds up to 50GB. Once the game has installed from the extracted file source, it'll get deleted. The game itself isn't 50GB. You just need that much room to install it.
What about lag compensation? Dedicated servers mean little if it uses horrible lag compensation.
I seriously doubt they do but even if they did, Oculus has already beat them to the punch. They have all the hype and dev kits out to whomever wants them. Their price point is reasonable and their tech has been proven to be amazing already. Sony has a huge hill to climb if they want to beat Oculus. Hell, Oculus already has a bunch of major developers touting the thing as being amazing and legit.
Sony screwed up by not partnering with Oculus. They could have helped with ...
Let's assume he's telling the truth about his father...
Giving his honest opinion about the game does NOT make him a horrible son. It makes him honest.
If he hated the game and still said it was great just because his father worked on it, that would make him a biased fanboy.
Titanfall's the only one that's doing anything different(not counting graphics), from what I've seen.
Exclusive DLC's just make me want it less. That's not an incentive for me. DLC is ruining gaming.
Please tell me where the hell capitalism is in all this? It's a monopoly and everyone knows it. You sound like the judge that was paid off. "If you don't like it just choose another provider". Really? Most people only have ONE choice and if you're lucky enough to have other choices, it's usually only one and they don't offer anything better. And then to say that if you don't have any choice it's the consumer's responsibility to decided if they w...